![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Juunkan-2 This is a
large cavernous Rockshelter 50 m west of Juunkan-1. At this site there
are 2 chambers that face to the south; a large western chamber that has
very deep sediment and a roof that is at a cathedral-like height, and an
eastern chamber that is lesser, smaller and largely not protected and
with a floor of bare rock. The main chamber is 10 m wide and 10 m deep
and its height at the dripline is 8 m. In the main chamber there are 3
general areas; in the western side, a scoured, rocky area there some
plants where a hole in the roof has allowed some rain to enter, a main
central area in which a large roof fall has resulted in the accumulation
of extensive sediment, and at the eastern rear of the site, a raised
area where bedrock is higher than in other areas, and where sediment
accumulation is at its least. A single 1 x
1 m test pit was excavated in 2008, as in the case of Juunkan-1. There
were a total of 21, 5 cm spits excavated that concluded at about 1.05 m
beneath the surface, where further excavation was prevented by large
amounts of roof fall. Within the deposit were 5 stratigraphic units,
which were largely related to changes in the weathering and minerals of
the ironstone. There were 5 hearths recovered, and flaked stone at high
frequency and animal bones were also recovered.
Dates of 470 ± 40 BP were determined for spits
2, 12 and 17 (Beta-247330) (540-490 cal. yr. BP), 16,160 ± 80 BP
(Beta-247331) (19,490-19,080 ca. yr. BP) and 20,090 ±100 BP
(Beta-247332). AMS techniques were used to obtain the lowest date of
20,090 BP and are derived from a depth of 85 cm beneath the surface.
Neither the level of the lowest artefact nor a basal date for the site
is represented by this date for the site. Slack et
al. suggest the deposit at
Juunkan-2 could be up to 0.5 m deeper than the excavations. At this site
272 flaked stone artefacts were recovered from the test pit excavation.
Spit 16 of the excavation was the only spit in which there were no
artefacts, with spit 18 (at 90 cm depth) being the lowest recorded age
determination of 20,090 BP. Unmodified flakes (95.2 %) dominate the
assemblage, with a few flakes (4.4 %) and even few cores (0.4 %). The
main raw materials used for the retouched artefacts are chert (n = 8),
ironstone (n = 4). The flaked
stone assemblage was discarded at a low rate, though the rate remained
steady throughout the occupation period, and then at spit 4, about 5,000
BP the discard rate increased fourfold. There doesn’t appear to have
been a hiatus in occupation or sedimentation at the site before, during
or after the LGM, though it is limited by the sample size.
The assemblage is shown by the analysis of the
richness and diversity of artefacts of raw material that the assemblage
is comprised of 5 different stone types; ironstone, chert, quartz,
chalcedony and siltstone. The assemblage was dominated by chert and
quartz (55.9 % and 29 %), lesser amounts of ironstone (13.6 %),
chalcedony (1.1 %) and siltstone (0.4 %). Slack et
al. point out that it is
interesting that in the lower spits ironstone is as dominant a raw
material as chert and quartz until the massive increase in discard rates
that occurred from about 5,000 BP onwards. At about 19,000 BP in spit 14
the first retouch in the assemblage is encountered, sharply peaking at
about 7,000 BP in spit 5, the time at which the first evidence of
backing is found.
Dominance of complete flakes (81.9 %) (n =
222),
is shown by the fragmentation rate of
flakes, with much lower quantities of broken flakes – distal account for
7.7 % (n = 2), proximal for 5.2 % (n = 14) and medial for 4.1 % (n =
11). Until split 3 at about 4,000 BP the ratio broken to unbroken flakes
is very low by which time the complete flakes account for 65.2 % (n =
43) and broken flakes account for 34.8 % (n = 23). Slack et
al suggest it is probably the
result of treadage, with the proposal that the shelter was used more
intensively at this time during the Mid-Holocene El Niño arid phase that
was experienced in Northern Australia. Ironstone
flakes dominated the assemblage until the Middle Holocene. According to
Slack et al. these flakes were generally heavier and had a greater size
range, especially between about 15,000 and 5,000 BP. Chert is the
dominant raw material after 5,000 BP, with an average weight of the
flakes much less than 1 g. It is generally the case that retouched
flakes are heavier than unmodified flakes, and with ironstone the
retouched flakes are generally significantly heavier.
Analysis of the amount of cortical surface
remaining on the dorsal surface of the flake is said by Slack et
al. to further support the
relationships between the size of complete flakes and extent of their
reduction. It is shown by this analysis that ironstone flakes are much
more likely than chert to have more cortex, an indication that ironstone
flakes have been reduced less than chert flakes. Also, chert and quartz
flakes are much more likely than ironstone flakes to have smaller, more
reduced platforms, as is evidenced by single and multiple flake scar
platforms. As well as
the flaked stone, 857 animal bone fragments were found in the Juunkan-2
site, from a wide variety of species. There were small species such as
native rats/mice, lizards and snakes, that made up the majority of the
species recovered (61 %, NISP = 523). Medium-large macropods, kangaroos
and wallabies, made up 30 % (NISP = 255), and the remainder of the
assemblage comprised bird and fish fragments. Among the species
identified are red kangaroo, common wallaroo, bandicoot, possum, pygmy
possum, echidna, bettong, native mouse, rat, gecko, skink, small bird
and fish, the bone fragments being recovered from almost all spits.
In the assemblage all the major skeletal
elements are represented, and the fragments of long bone shafts
contribute the highest number of fragments (NISP = 120).
There are however, differences in the
frequency of elements between the smaller and larger species. Limb bones
dominate elements from the smaller species and they are largely
unfragmented, a large proportion being of complete skeletal elements.
The teeth are most frequently occurring with vertebra being the next
most frequents. Contrasting with this, bones from medium-large
individuals are highly fragmented and there is a heavy weighting towards
fragments of the long bone shaft. The relative paucity of lower limb
elements of macropods can probably be accounted for by the fragments of
long bone shafts. Teeth from macropods that are medium-large display a
mixture of tooth wear stages which range from unworn to extremely worn
suggests a mixture of young and old individuals.
Evidence of burning is displayed by 7 % (NISP
= 61) of the assemblage, of which 1/3 have been calcined, which suggests
they were deposited in fire for longer periods of time following
defleshing. The burned bones are from a range of species, and were not
confined to any single class of individual. As well as burning, evidence
of tooth marks are present on 5 specimens, and 5 fragments recovered
from spit 15 show possible cut marks, including the sacrum, pelvis and
fragments of long bones of a kangaroo. The faunal assemblage has been
shown by taphonomic analysis to represent a deposit that is
in situ with rapid burials,
because the bones are not weathered and the surfaces of the bones show
no physical evidence of either aeolian or fluvial transport.
Slack et
al. (2009) suggest faunal
analysis at Juunkan-2 may provide important diachronic information about
subsistence strategies in the region. Medium macropods, wallaroos, were
more common at the beginning of the occupation, and towards the end of
the occupation the large macropod (kangaroos) frequency increased,
though the majority of species and distributions of skeletal elements
appear to have remained consistent over time. As burned and calcined
bone, when considered in conjunction of the evidence of hearths,
suggests that people were responsible for some of the faunal
accumulation, the presence of macropods is therefore considered to
probably be a cultural accumulation rather than a natural accumulation.
A primary human role in the accumulation is further suggested by the
heavy fragmentation of the lower limb bones of macropods, as well as
possible cut marks. Yet further evidence that people were involved in
the accumulation of bone is the presence of bone from species that are
less common such as echidna and fish. It is rare to find preserved
faunal remains in rockshelters, and it is suggested that further faunal
analysis could potentially contribute significant information with
regard to the exploitation of species in the Pilbara for which there is
severe shortage of published data.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||