![]() |
||||||||||||||
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Glacial Microbes – Their Power
A key control on biogeochemical cycles in the polar regions is organic
carbon fluxes from glaciers. The importance of microbial communities on
the surface of glaciers in the setting of these inputs is shown by 2
analyses of carbon cycling in glaciers.
In the past it was believed that glaciers were inhospitable environments
for life. Over the past 15-20 years, however, it has been documented
that vibrant, diverse microbial communities exist in all areas of ice
(Boetius, 2015). Generally, these communities are associated with liquid
water, either between the bedrock and the base of the glacier, or in
pores ranging from micrometre-sized structures within the ice lattice to
larger holes and streams on top of the glacier. The balance between the
amount of fixed carbon that has been produced and consumed by these
microbes is not well constrained. These microbial communities have been
found to produce more carbon than expected and therefore play important
roles in the glacial carbon cycle in
Antarctica and
Greenland ice sheets, respectively, writing in
Nature Geoscience, Smith et
al (Smith et
al., 2017) and Musilova et
al. (Musilova et al., 2017),
respectively.
The amount of dissolved organic matter (DOM) can approximate carbon
fixed on glaciers, though it has proved complicated to pinpoint its
sources. It is not clear, in particular, what the relative contribution
to the consumption of organic matter that is sourced externally is on
the one hand and , and organic matter that has been produced by
photosynthesis on the other hand. It is suggested by the radiocarbon
values of this organic material that the carbon is from an ancient
source (Hood et al., 2009), which is potentially at odds with the
microbes being implicated as the primary source of DOM (Bhatia et al.,
2010; Pautler et al., 2012). If the organic matter is relict from
microbial processing in the past or microbial breakdown and recycling of
ancient carbon, the age of the carbon could be explained. An alternative
explanation could be that aerosols derived from combustion that were
deposited on the ice carry an ancient radiocarbon signature, and on
glacial surfaces in the Northern Hemisphere may be a source of carbon
(Stubbins et al., 2012).
Organic carbon and nutrients are carried from the glaciers to the sea by
run-off from glaciers to eventually feed and stimulate the marine
communities at the height of the melt season. As such, a clearer
understanding may be obtained of the way in which glacial microbial
communities affect carbon fluxes, and this will elucidate the links
between glacial and marine biogeochemical cycles.
The balance of carbon fluxes that are microbially mediated in the
supraglacial stream system in Antarctica have been addressed by Smith et
al. (Smith et
al., 2017) with an elegant
combination of incubation experiments, carbon isotope analyses and
spectroscopy.
1)
Spectroscopy was used to confirm that in Antarctic streams DOM was
probably derived from microbes.
2)
They showed that the carbon demand was exceeded by total microbial
production of carbon that exceeded carbon demand by approximately a
factor of 4, which left the excess to be exported to downstream
environments.
3)
Organic carbon was isotopically labelled to monitor uptake of organic
carbon by glacial microbes, observing that DOM is utilised rapidly by
supraglacial microbes.
Previous studies have reported microbial carbon delivery to Alaskan and
alpine watersheds that have a high glacial cover, and this is consistent
with a high fraction of carbon export (Hood et al., 2009; Singer et al.,
2012). An experimental confirmation of inferences from previous studies
is this molecular level demonstration of the power of microbes to
assimilate and recycle existing microbial organic matter.
The question of microbial carbon cycling has been approached somewhat
differently (Musilova et al., 2017), as they explored small holes that
were water-filled containing microbial communities in the supraglacial
system of the Greenland ice sheet. They observed overall net organic
carbon production, that was the result of higher production rates via
photosynthesis than consumption of via respiration in all supraglacial
habitats during a single melt season, using complementary methods to
Smith et al. (Smith et
al., 2017). It is therefore
consistent with the conclusion of Smith et
al. (Smith et
al., 2017), based on the
Antarctic observations that they found a net supraglacial carbon surplus
in Greenland.
Also, the concentrations of bulk supra glacial DOM in Greenland varied
over time, as did the compounds that are more easily broken down
biologically, such as amino acids and carbohydrates. The dynamic nature
of microbial production and consumption of growth substrates in glacial
environments is underscored by this variability. The only supraglacial
of organic matter that is produced externally was found in waters that
contained significant amounts of wind-blown dust, in spite of the
northern Hemisphere setting.
An active microbial community is described by both papers, though at
opposite poles, that has a substantial impact on carbon cycling on the
surface of glaciers. The idea that the surfaces of glaciers are poor
hosts for microbial metabolism is deflated by this. Instead,
photosynthetic microbes support extensive microbial communities that
feed off the carbon they produce, as well as being able to generate
enough carbon to export reactive DOM to downstream environments. Some of
these latter non-photosynthetic microbial communities in the Northern
Hemisphere may also degrade material from atmospheric deposition; though
Smith et al. found no
evidence of this metabolism in the regions of Antarctica that were more
remote.
Radiocarbon values of supraglacial DOM were not measured by either
study, so it remains uncertain why the carbon that was found previously
to be so old. Evidence is emerging, however, of unexpected metabolisms
in glacial systems that are driven by light, such as the oxidation of
carbon monoxide (Franzetti et al., 2016). Kujawinski suggests older
sources of inorganic and organic carbon may be introduced in the pool of
organic material, which has been actively cycled, on the surface of
glaciers. Kujawinski suggests future investigations that are capable of
linking metabolic processes with analyses of carbon isotopes are needed
to establish the relative flux and radiocarbon age of carbon through
these pathways.
Smith et al. and Musilova et
al. have established that the
microbial carbon cycling on the surfaces of glaciers cannot be ignored,
regardless of the mechanism. Labile DOM is contributed by microbial
activity to supraglacial and downstream environments where it is
combined with organic matter from within or below the glacier. These
organic matter pools are, of course, also probably derived from microbes
(Musilova et al., 2017; Bhatia et al., 2010), which underscores that
these microscopic organisms are the heart of the glacial carbon cycle.
The next step will be the exploration of the molecular and metabolic
details of the rates and extents of microbial processing in these
habitats.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |