Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
Aboriginal Settlement in the LGM at Brockman,
Pilbara, Western Australia
The authors say this paper describes the
results and implications of recent excavations on the Hamersley Iron
Brockman 4 tenement, close to Tom Price in Western Australia. The
results were from 2 rock shelters in which evidence of Aboriginal
occupation was found that began at least 32,000 BP, continuing
throughout the
Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The authors1
propose the nature of Aboriginal foraging patterns that are displayed,
based on the records of flaked stone and faunal remains, for the
Brockman region. Since
excavations began in the Pilbara about 30 years ago there are 2 research
questions that are still to be answered the age and continuity of the
occupation sites. In regards to the settlement of the continent the age
of the sites continues to be important for determining the timing and
the direction from which the settlement took place. At the time the
first synthesis and review of the initial archaeological excavations for
the Hamersley Plateau (Brown, 1987) the oldest date that had been
determined for an archaeological site was 26,300 + 500 BP (SUA1510) that
had been obtained for the Newman Rock Shelter (P2055.2) (Brown, 1987:22, Troilett, 1982). It is not until recently that the antiquity of this
site has been surpassed by estimate of the age from excavations at
Djadjiling, Hope Downs in the eastern Hamersley Range, in spite of
intensive archaeological work over 20 years, that was mostly carried out
by consulting projects that included more than 50 excavations and more
than 100 radiocarbon dates (see Slack, 2008). The date from Djadjiling
indicates that occupation dates from at least 35,159 ± 537 BP (Morse in
the same issue of Archaeology in Oceania).
According to Slack et
al. (2009) there is a
question concerning whether following the occupation of the Pilbara by
the Aboriginal people the occupation continued throughout period of
increased aridity that occurred during the last glacial period during
OIS2, between about 29,000-15,000 cal. yr. BP (see Burroughs, 2005: 30,
93), and the aridity of the LGM in particular, a time when the sea
levels were at their lowest between 22,000-19,000 cal. yr. BP (Yokoyama
et al., 2000). Slack et
al., (2009) say that over the
past few decades there has been a consistent focus of research on the
occupation of the Pilbara throughout the LGM, with the Hamersley and
Chichester Rages being proposed as likely to have been refuges (Hiscock,
1988; Smith, 1987, 1989; Veth, 1989, 1993). Over these same few decades
it has been shown by research that the impact on climate of the LGM has
been more severe, and to have occurred at an earlier time than had
previously been believed (and peaking in the Greenland ice-core isotope
stratigraphy at 21,200 cal. yr. BP see Turney et
al., 2006; Barrows & Juggins,
2005).
According to Slack et
al., (2009) the nature of
regional patterns of occupation during the LGM that has been revised and
extended has been summarised on the basis of 7 specific rock shelter
sites in the Pilbara Uplands that have been argued to exhibit refuge
occupation during the LGM (see O’Connor & Veth, 2006: 33-39). Yirra (Veitch
et al., 2005) and Milly’s
Cave (Marwick, 2002) have been said to be the only sites to exhibit
persuasive evidence of occupation during the LGM. The suggestion that
there is no unequivocal evidence of occupation during the LGM at the
remaining 5 sites (Marwick, 2002) is agreed with by (O’Connor & Veth,
2006). According to the analysis by Marwick the first 2 of these sites,
Newman Rockshelter (Troilett, 1982) and Newman Orebody XXIX Rockshelter
(Maynard, 1980), have stratigraphic records and radiocarbon chronologies
that suggest, though don’t confirm, there is evidence of human
occupation17,000-13,000 BP [i.e. 20,000-15,000 cal. yr. BP] (OxCal
v4.0.5 was used in radiocarbon calibration in this article) (Marwick,
2002: 23; see also Comtesse, 2003). Similarly, evidence of human
occupation at this period is regarded as ambiguous. Uncertainties have
been a problem for the interpretation of artefacts and their
relationship to carbon dates at Mesa J J24 (Hughes & Quartermaine,
1992), Malea Rockshelter (McDonald, Hale & Associate, 1997) and
Manganese Gorge 8 (Veth, 1995:736).
The only sites in the interior of the Pilbara
for which there is good evidence of occupation during the LGM
are Yirra and
Milly’s Cave. It has been
said that at Yirra and Milly’s Cave artefacts are found between
conventional radiocarbon ages of 19,270 ± 140 BP (Wk-8954) (23,440 –
22480 cal. yr. BP) and (16,950 ± 90 BP (Wk-9148) (20,300 – 19,889 cal.
yr. BP) which are consistent with refuge occupation during the LGM (Veitch
et al., 2005:58). It is,
however, not certain whether Yirra was occupied more intensively at the
height of the LGM of immediately following it, as there are acknowledged
unresolved problems with bioturbation, with critical dates at the peak,
and with little additional information about the frequency of artefacts,
the site and climatic history of the locality of the site.
According to Marwick’s 2002 paper the only
clear indication of human occupation during the LGM has been found at
the Milly’s Cave site. Slack et
al. (2009) agree but it is suggested by re-evaluation of the timing
of the LGM (Yokoyama et al.,
2000; Lambeck & Chappell, 2001) that the site may have been only
sporadically occupied before the close of the LGM. More intense
occupation immediately following the peak of the LGM is suggested by
Slack et al. (2009), to
plausibly be indicated by the lowest radiocarbon determinations and
frequency of artefacts at Milly’s Cave, and beneath this level, between
about 21,000 and 30,000 cal. yr. BP, rates of discard are very low (see
Marwick, 2002:25). Slack et al.
(2009) have also noted that at this site the lower 2 radiocarbon dates
of 14,150 ± 320 BP (18,024 – 16,022 cal. yr. BP) and 18,750 ± 460 BP
(23,686-21,075 cal. ye. BP) are separated by as little as 5 cm of
deposit. Slack et al. (2009)
suggest that, as such, the data from Milly’s Cave is more compelling
evidence for increased occupation towards the end of the LGM, rather
than an increased level of occupation throughout the LGM. If it is
accepted that the Hamersley Plateau was a refuge area for humans during
periods when aridity was extreme, the question arises what was the
nature of this occupation? Referring to Milly’s Cave, Marwick suggests
the ranges of territories were of reduced area. It is considered more
generally by O’Connor and Veth that retraction to and within the ranges
occurred, though it would be evident that there would be differences in
reference to local catchments that range from being abandoned completely
through to increased use (O’Connor & Veth, 2006:41). The shortage
of evidence for subsistence is a significant barrier to understanding
the utilisation of refuge areas before, during and following the LGM.
The main evidence that is needed is organic remains that are
systematically analysed in conjunction with flaked stone. The move
towards broad-spectrum diets at the terminal Pleistocene that has been
discussed (Edwards & O’Connell, 1995), but a true understanding of the
phenomenon has not yet been achieved, mainly as a result of the very few
sites containing evidence of occupation that includes faunal and floral
remains, and not just flaked stone. Solid
evidence has been found showing that the Pilbara region was occupied
prior and during the LGM, though cultural remains have been found in a
few sites that have been excavated and even fewer sites for which the
work has been published. Sites such as Newman Rockshelter, Newman
Orebody XXIX Shelter, Malea Rockshelter and Milly’s Cave have contained
little faunal material. Faunal remains were found at Malea (Edwards &
Murphy, 2003), but mostly is still to be published, little more than a
species list of fauna and the fact that it is highly fragmented had been
published at this time this article was published (Edwards & Murphy,
2003:45). Faunal material was recovered at Malea in only some of the
excavation units, being confined to the upper 16 units. It is argued by
Edwards & Murphy that this distribution of faunal remains is likely due
to preservation factors, not the actual absence of the remains. Further
work has been carried out at Malea and the analysis is now in progress
and it is hoped that it will supply information that is needed to
increase understanding of the subsistence and settlement of the area. At
Marillana A, faunal remains were preserved, though discussion is limited
to a quantitative analysis of the density per stratigraphic unit
(Marwick, 2005:1362-4). In Newman
Orebody XXIX faunal remains are limited to 1 macropod molar found in the
top excavation unit (Maynard, 1980:5), and data is missing from Newman
Rockshelter and Milly’s Cave (Marwick, 2003). A significant problem is
caused in the understanding of refuge areas by the absence of faunal
data, as well as to knowledge of subsistence of early Aboriginal
settlers as a whole.
In this paper (Slack et
al. 2009) have reported new
sites in the region that have the potential to provide subsistence data
that is important and frameworks that are more robust concerning
Aboriginal settlement on the Hamersley plateau during the LGM.
Brockman 4, Hamersley Plateau – Excavations Excavations
at 2 particular sites of a series of excavations in the Pilbara, about
60 km west of the of the town of Tom Price, Juunkan-1 and Juunkan-2 have
provided further substantiation for the antiquity of the occupation in
this region of more than 30,000 years. They have also provided
compelling evidence that occupation continued even at the height of the
LGM, 22,000-19,000 cal. yr. BP. As the location of Brockman 4 mining
tenement, in which the sites are located, is well within the central
Hamersley Plateau and is more than 75 km north of the nearest
substantial watercourse, the Ashburton River, though it is ephemeral,
and this location of the sites makes the finds interesting and to some
extent unexpected. Juunkan-1 and
Juunkan-2 are both located within a small ironstone gorge not far from a
small ephemeral watercourse, the Purlykunti Creek. There are 3 other
Rockshelter sites in this gorge, though the occupation sequence at all 3
is very recent. There is also a very large scatter of artefacts on an
extensive floodplain below the gorge. It is believed that all the
dominant raw materials, ironstone, chert, quartz and siltstone, are
available from the creek at and near to open scatter.
Discussion
Slack et
al. say new information concerning the prehistory of the Pilbara is
provided by the results of their excavations at Brockman. Early
occupation of beyond 35,000 BP is further supported by the data they
provided. A continual, though infrequent, occupation of the Brockman
region during OIS 2, and even at the height of the LGM, is indicated by
the cultural sequence at Juunkan-2.
Analysis of the data in terms of landscape use
by hunter gatherers was limited by the size of the sample, though Slack
et al. (2009) made a number of observations and suggested hypotheses. It
is indicated by the evidence from these 2 rockshelters that people have
been living in this area of the Hamersley during the LGM. The local
population may have been more residentially mobile at times of more
severe aridity than might be expected, given the dominant refuge models
and their previous application to the Pilbara (see Veth, 2005: 101).
According to Slack et al. (2009) it is clear that people were retreating into gorges on
the margins of the ranges near main river courses, as well as making a
more complex use of the landscape. It is also suggested that they were
‘possibly following local weather
patterns and allowing access to the less drained areas occurred’
(Slack et al. 2009). In this
paper it is also considered likely residential mobility decreased
following the LGM as rainfall increased. If this suggestion is correct
it would explain the high discard rate at Brockman; the increase in
faunal remains density at Juunkan-2 in the later phases of occupation,
as well as those trends in the flaked stone that were observed at
Milly’s Cave (Marwick, 2002: 29). Slack et
al. (2009) also suggest that though there was a decrease in
residential mobility there was an increase in logistical mobility, at
least on the local level. The greater range of the raw materials and the
larger sizes of the flaked material over the last few thousand years of
the Pleistocene, which continued to the Middle Holocene, is the basis
for this suggestion. The intensity of the apparent reduction and
frequency of artefact discard increased slightly in the Middle and Late
Holocene. Behavioural implications that are suggested by the faunal
remains provide additional support for the occupation increase that
occurred in later periods, though it is also shown by the fauna that
both Juunkan-1 and Juunkan-2 were occupied continuously in all periods.
This trend is considered likely to be related to increased levels of
population, as has been suggested (Marwick, 2002), given the results of
other excavations within this area all dating to this period.
Conclusion It is
suggested that the results of this ongoing project further emphasise
that the archaeology of the Pilbara region will continue to play an
important role in developing an understanding of the timing of arid
settlement, and the nature of hunter gatherer subsistence during periods
of uncertainty such as the LGM.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading |