![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Australia: The Land Where Time Began |
||||||||||||||
|
Australian Aboriginal Astronomy – Wurdi Youang – a Stone Arrangement
with Possible Solar Indications
Wurdi Youang is an Aboriginal stone arrangement in Victoria, Australia,
that is in the shape of an egg. This paper presents the results of a new
survey of the site which show that the major axis aligns to within a few
degrees of east-west. The survey confirms a previous hypothesis that it
aligns with the position of the setting Sun on the horizon at the
equinox and the solstices, and also shows that 2 independent sets of
indicators align with these directions. It is shown that these
alignments are not likely to have arisen by chance, and that the stone
arrangement builders appear to have deliberately aligned the site on
positions that are astronomically significant.
Aboriginal Astronomy
It has been well established that in many Australian Aboriginal cultures
the night sky plays an important role (Stanbridge, 1861; Mountford,
1956; Haynes, 1992; Johnson, 1998; Cairns & Harney, 2003; Norris &
Norris, 2009; Norris & Hamacher, 2009, 2011). The sky is used to
regulate calendars, and mark the time of year when particular foods
become available, as well as being associated with traditional songs and
ceremonies. There were also practical applications of the sky in
navigation and time keeping (Cairns & Harney, 2003; Clarke, 1997), and
there is also some evidence for meaning in astronomical phenomena, e.g.
eclipses, the motion of the planets and tides (Norris & Hamacher, 2009).
In ceremonies and artefacts, such as the Morning Star pole used in
Yolngu ceremony (Norris & Norris, 2009; Allen, 1975), and in depictions
in bark paintings of constellations such as Scorpius (ibid.),
astronomical themes are also widespread. It is not well-established if
any measurements were ever made of the positions of the celestial
bodies, also if there is any reference in the ethnographic literature to
the solstices or equinoxes.
Norris et al. suggest it is
not wise to assume similarities between the approximately 400 different
Aboriginal cultures in Australia, though it is important to acknowledge
that there are some similarities in some cases. E.g. the association of
Orion and a young man, or a group of males, and the association of the
Pleiades with a group of girls, are present in many Aboriginal cultures
across Australia. In this paper the focus is entirely on the Wurdi
Youang Stone Arrangement, the Wathaurong people, and similarities with
any other Aboriginal cultures are not assumed, though we refer to them
to set the context.
Stone Arrangements
Several Aboriginal cultures across Australia constructed stone circles
that were of many different morphologies, such as circles, lines,
pathways, standing stones, and cairns (Enright, 1937; Towle, 1939;
Palmer, 1977; Lane & Fullagar, 1980; Frankel, 1982; Attenbrow, 2002).
Some of the arrangements are believed to have had practical purposes;
such as fish traps, land boundaries, while others had ceremonial
purposes, such as initiation, or burial. Stone artefacts are often found
associated with stone arrangements, such as rock engravings, scarred
trees, and axe grinding grooves (e.g. Lane & Fullagar, 1980; Lane,
2009).
Stone arrangements vary in size from 1 m to 100 m, and local rocks are
typically used in their construction, and are small enough to be carried
by 1 or 2 people, though larger rocks are occasionally found that weigh
up to 500 kg (Lane & Fullagar, 1980; Long & Schell, 1999). Ceremonial
stone arrangements are commonly located on ridges and hill tops that
have a panoramic view of the surrounding landscape (Hamacher et
al., 2012). It has been
suggested (McCarthy, 1940) that the surrounding landscapes were
incorporated into the stone arrangements that were used for ceremonial
purposes, and that they may indicate the direction of a landmark, or
mimic a land feature.
According to Norris et al.
there are 30 stone arrangements that have been recorded in Victoria
(Marshall & Webb, 1999), though more are known to Norris et
al. and it is claimed (Lane,
2009) that there are actually hundreds in western Victoria. There are no
known ethnographic records or oral histories about these arrangements,
and Norris et al. suggest
this may be because they are considered to be sacred and secret to
Aboriginal communities.
Wurdi Youang
The Wurdi Youang stone arrangement is also known as the Mount Rothwell
Archaeological Site. It is located between Melbourne and Geelong, near
the small town of Little River, and in 1977 it was declared a protected
site by the Victorian Archaeological Survey (AAV Site No. 7922-001). The
Wathaurong people, known also as the Wada Wurrung, are the traditional
owners, their land extending to the west from the Werribee River to
Fiery Creek beyond Shipton, and northwards from the south coast to the
watershed of the Great Dividing Range north of Ballarat. The precise
location is not given in this paper to protect the site, though access
may be granted after gaining the permission from the traditional owners
via Aboriginal Affairs Victoria.
Wurdi Youang consists of about 100 basalt stones that are roughly
egg-shaped, about 50 m across along the major axis, which is aligned
east-west. The stones are of a range of sizes from small rocks about 0.2
m in diameter to standing stones up to 0.75 m high, some of which appear
to be supported by trigger stones. It has been estimated (Lane &
Fullagar) the combined mass of the stones to be about 23 tonnes. They
don’t appear to be part of the bedrock, so potentially moveable.
A group of 3 large stones, about 0.6m high, are particularly prominent
at the western end of the stone arrangement. These stones are at the
highest point of the stone arrangement, the land on which it is built
sloping downwards from the western end to the eastern end, a total fall
across the arrangement of about 4 m.
There are no known eyewitness record of the construction of the stone
arrangement or use by the Wathaurong people, the site is considered to
have been constructed by Aboriginal people for the following reasons
(Aboriginal Affairs Victoria 2003):
·
There are similar stone arrangements that are known of in Victoria,
though none are known that resemble exactly Wurdi Youang (e.g. Massola,
1963);
·
The arrangement is on a property owned by a single family since the area
was first settled, and a European origin of the arrangement is ruled out
by family tradition (Lane & Fullagar (Fullagar?, 1980);
·
There are no known counterparts of the arrangements among colonial
structures: it is located on rocky ground of no known agricultural or
commercial value, it would not have been suitable for defining the
boundaries of a sheep dip, sheep pen, or cattle dip, and evidence does
not exist that it ever formed part of a fence or building (Lane &
Fullagar, 1980);
·
Among the Wathaurong owners there is traditional knowledge regarding the
sanctuary of the site (Marshall & Webb, 1999).
Also, the Wathaurong owners have found aboriginal artefacts on the site.
It is not known when it was constructed. It is believed the Aboriginal
people have occupied the area from about 25,000 BCE (Clark, 1990) to
1835 when they were displaced by European settlers (Clark, 1995). The
name “Wurdi” has been suggested (Morieson, 1994) to mean “plenty of
people”, and Youang means “bald” or “mountain”, which has been presumed
to relate to the nearby mountain range that was called “You Yangs”. It
has been suggested (Morieson, 2003) that the name “Wurdi” may be related
to a word from the Woiwurrung “Wurding” which means abalone, which
refers to the shape of the stone arrangement possibly being in the shape
of a abalone shell, or possibly another mollusc, in which case the site
may possibly have been used for increase rituals. These suggestions may,
however, be weighed against the distance of 18 km between the site and
Port Phillip Bay, where abalone could be found, the nearest major body
of salt water.
Around the Wurdi Youang the vegetation is low and scrubby at the
present, though it may have been much higher prior to European
occupation, possibly even obscuring the view of the setting Sun. Norris
et al. also note the common
practice among Aboriginal people around the continent of clearing the
land by fire periodically when necessary, as part of the standard
Aboriginal land management practices (Clark, 2007; Gammage, 2011), so
Norris et al. say it is
equally possible that the vegetation was removed. They also suggest any
such growth would need to have been cleared in those directions if this
site was used to observe the position of the setting Sun.
The Morieson Hypothesis
It was suggested (Morieson, 2003) that 3 small outlying stones, the
“outliers”, indicated the position of the setting Sun at solstices and
equinoxes when they were viewed from 3 prominent stones at the western
apex. The Morieson hypothesis is specifically that the outliers were
placed deliberately in their locations to indicate the position on the
horizon of the Setting Sun at the equinoxes and solstices. The primary
aim of this paper is to test the Morieson hypothesis.
There are significant differences between the results of the only 2
surveys of this site that were available, which suggests that at least 1
of them was seriously flawed, in spite of the potential importance of
this site to knowledge of pre-contact Aboriginal culture. Also, the
outliers that were proposed by Morieson were not included in either
survey, so a new survey was required to test the Morieson hypothesis.
There is also a previous survey that Norris et
al. were made aware of after
the new survey was completed.
Secular Changes in the Sky
Relative to the stars, the Earth’s axis of rotation processes in a
complete circle of 23.5o radius over a period of about 26,000
years. This motion, the ‘precession of the equinoxes’ causes the
apparent position of the stars to move by 1o every 72 years
from the viewpoint of the observer. The position of the stars would be
significantly different from the present if the site had been used
thousands of years ago. Therefore the position of the setting of a star
on the horizon changes relatively rapidly over time, and a stellar
alignment from 2,000 years ago could differ from that of the present by
almost 30o.
Also, stars move relative to their neighbours as they are not
stationary. This effect, ‘stellar proper motion’, results in the
apparent position of the stars shifting relative to each other over
time. An example is the Southern Cross, which would have looked
significantly different 10,000 years ago.
The declinations of the Sun and Moon, and therefore their positions of
rising and setting, are not affected by precession. The apparent
declination of the Sun is, however, affected by a much smaller effect,
the ‘nutation’ in the obliquity of the rotational axis of the Earth,
which varies by about 2.4o over a period of 41,000 years.
Such variations will have no measureable effect on these alignments,
because the alignments that are discussed in this paper are accurate to
a few degrees.
The date of construction of the stone arrangement has no measurable
effect on the rising and setting positions of the Sun.
The aim of this paper was to test the Morieson hypothesis.
A simulation was run 10,000 times and the results imply that the
likelihood of the Wurdi Youang stone arrangement occurring by chance is
0.25 %. Norris et al. say
they recognise that this is not a precise calculation, and that their
simple approximation to the site geometry introduces the possibility of
bias, though this process nevertheless provides a rough estimate of the
likelihood that the alignments are produced by chance alone.
They concluded therefore that it is extremely unlikely that the outlier
stones happen to indicate the astronomical alignments by chance, and
that the alignments were almost certainly deliberate human constructions
to indicate the equinoxes and solstices.
Newly Identified Alignments
Another prominent alignment, as well as the Morieson hypothesis, is the
major axis of the stone arrangement, which lies roughly on the east-west
axis. A prominent viewing position would be either the centre of the
stone arrangement or the eastern apex, which is the lowest part of the
arrangement. Roughly the same place on the horizon is indicated by both
these viewing points, which is due west of the site, or the setting of
the equinoctial Sun.
According to Norris et al. it
is important to consider if there are any prominent alignments at the
site. There are 2 straight sections to the east of the ring that are
included in the egg-shape of the stone ring which also constitute
prominent alignments. Norris et
al. consider that these prominent alignments in the stone ring would
also be chosen as the only prominent alignments by an unbiased observer,
whether they look at the plan or visiting the actual site. Only the
western-facing direction of the alignment is considered in each case, as
the site was built on a slope rising to the west, so the westerly lines
point to the horizon, while the easterly counterparts point down into
the valley. There is a relatively straight section in each case, the
precise direction being poorly defined, as it depends on the choice of
stones to be included (e.g. in a least squares fit) and as a result of
damaged stones. The direction of each straight section is, however,
roughly parallel to the Morieson alignments, when the directions of the
equinox and the solstices are superimposed on the ring and on the
Morieson alignments.
The Gap is at an azimuth of 272o and an elevation of 2o,
from a viewing height of 1.6 m, from the eastern vertex of the stone
arrangement, as defined by the intersection of straight lines (Norris,
Norris & Hamacher 2013, Fig. 8). There the Sun would set at equinox
directly behind the 3 prominent stones at the western apex of the
arrangement, when viewed from the vertex, and would be visible briefly
through the Gap before setting, which would be dependant of the exact
position and height of the viewer. Norris et
al. point out that these
directions are not adjusted to fit the ring, being defined
astronomically. The diagram in (Norris, Norris & Hamacher 2013, Fig. 8)
shows that the straight sections of the ring are well aligned to the
astronomical directions as the Morieson alignments, though the straight
lines are not well defined, and not exactly straight.
If the outliers are included as prominent alignments, and the viewing
position is the same as Morieson, Norris et
al. consider that there are 7
prominent alignments:
·
The 3 noted by Morieson,
·
A 4th over the new outlier,
·
The major axis of the ring, and
·
The 2 sections of the ring that are almost straight.
Conclusion
The Morieson hypothesis that the position of the setting Sun at the
solstices and equinoxes is supported by this detailed survey of Wurdi
Youang. The likelihood of this occurring by chance was shown by
statistical analysis to be extremely low. Also, the straight sides of
the arrangement were found to indicate the solstices, and the point
where the Sun sets at equinox is marked by the 3 prominent stones at the
western apex of the arrangement, when viewed from the eastern apex.
In this paper there are no assumptions made concerning the viewing
position, as the aim of the study is to test a specific
hypothesis that has been made
about viewing position. The many other possible sight-lines have been
tested by Monte-Carlo analysis. It has been shown that the viewing
position and the orientations suggested by Morieson are significant, and
are not likely to have arisen by chance.
The age or purpose of the stone arrangement is not known, though it can
be said with reasonable confidence that these alignments were
intentional, while Norris et al.
are careful not to claim that this is an “Aboriginal observatory”, as
there are no known ethnographic or oral histories that explain the
purpose or use of the sight. There are plans for further research to
determine age of the site, as well as to search for similar sites
elsewhere.
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Author: M.H.Monroe Email: admin@austhrutime.com Sources & Further reading | ||||||||||||||